Alternative Voting system

Discuss the Race / Assault server here.
User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iRobot » Tue 21 Aug , 2012 11:03 pm

Glacier (Assault)
Protocore (Assault)
SkyRace (Rais)
Mercury (Assault)
I miscounted, was four. Still emptied server.

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by Azarael » Tue 21 Aug , 2012 11:07 pm

Skyrais is not assault and Glacier is pushing it considering the ion tank is so free

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iRobot » Tue 21 Aug , 2012 11:18 pm

Whether you consider it assault or not, it's attacking and defending which makes people leave the game, I don't even mind assault, but I'm saying nobody plays anything with 2 players on the server.

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iZumo » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 12:43 am

Hmm, there was like 0-1 votes for RACE in the games though :/

But yeah, chainvoted AS quit. Perhaps we could drop back to 1 AS game out of last 4 max.

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by Azarael » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 12:50 am

Isn't that how it currently is?

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iZumo » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 12:56 am

Well with the nerf the degrade isn't that hard to actually prevent it.

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iRobot » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 10:52 am

You need to remember 4 assault games can easily be 3 hours. 4 race maps are usually not even 1 hour.

So you get this long period where race players wont join, which is why it gradually empties. At the end of this 3 hour period, the 'assault players' do not suddenly decide to vote race, so the server stays empty on an assault map.

Maybe disable assault from being voted when the player count is less than 10.

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iZumo » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 11:14 am

The playercount dropped below 10 on Glacier, not on the previous maps. Also, don't forget there is nothing wrong with 3v3 AS in non-peak hours.

I think that with current system I'll simply disable AS for the period when 1 out of 4 last games was AS. Sadly, even AS players have to be treated like complete tards in this matter :/

Also among RACE players, there are players willing to play on empty server and begin the population, on AS that's such players are exception.

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by iRobot » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 11:28 am

Izumo_CZ wrote:The playercount dropped below 10 on Glacier, not on the previous maps
I'm aware of that, as I said, I'm not against assault, I'm not trying to champion its removal.

I just don't see the point of voting a big assault map like Hera or Mercury when its only 4v4, both teams will get bloody nowhere and be more likely to leave. Glacier is a fine example really, since with low player counts it's increasingly hard to stop the ion tank, so people will get frustrated.

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: Alternative Voting system

Post by Azarael » Wed 22 Aug , 2012 3:49 pm

Hard disable AS after two maps in a row and keep the 0.35 base penalty.

Add Hera, Glacier and TheCanyon to the high-playercount only list, as TheCanyon is also used to kill the server.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest