LDG-Gaming

I've consulted this one with giZmo, as he wanted to give permaban directly. Don't really see it as "targeted" sexism either, just insulting (although that's difficult to say) and it's not really the only case. Don't see an occurence of profane language w/o clear insult though, so where's the problem there?

Log here: http://ut2004.ldg-gaming.eu/logs/showlo ... [REV].html

Oh and Hamish, speaking fair & square: this isn't democracy, if mod / admin tells you to stop something, stop it or suffer the consequences.

Full context:

> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: lol elforia
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: finshed sucking off jester yet?
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: swallow the gravy
> team-spec*Eiforia: 1 more such bs and i'll kick you
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: why?
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: I haven't done anything against the rules?
> team-spec*Eiforia: because i want so
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: Fight the Powa!!!
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: compared to the other admins
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: you can't even hold your own corner
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: you're just a small boy, in a mans world
> team-spec*Eiforia: i warned you...
> mr.boggieman: nice knowing u hamish
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: do it bro
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: use that power
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: Kick me
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: I haven't done anything against the rules
> Hush: yeah, we are all men here
> Påß: yep
> team-spec*Eiforia: sexism
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: Come at me bro.
> Påß: lal
> team-spec*Eiforia: "bro"
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: ok, come at me sis
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: dis lag
> Påß: im laggin hard +_*
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: all down to Elforia's horse porn
> Påß: lol
> CanisLupus: ok son
> CanisLupus: enjoy your vacation
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: lawl
> team-spec*Eiforia: bye bye Hamish
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: remember
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: FIGHT THE POWER
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: FUCK THESE BULLSHIT ADMINS
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish left the game.

Violations of 3c, 3e and 4a. Since a staff tag (team-spec*) was in use and there is a clear period between the first annoyance and the second, there are no appeal grounds. You decided to say stupid shit to a staff member and they elected to ban for it. Some of us will tolerate it and some will not.

Azarael wrote:Full context:

> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: lol elforia
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: finshed sucking off jester yet?
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: swallow the gravy
> team-spec*Eiforia: 1 more such bs and i'll kick you
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: why?
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: I haven't done anything against the rules?
> team-spec*Eiforia: because i want so
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: Fight the Powa!!!
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: compared to the other admins
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: you can't even hold your own corner
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: you're just a small boy, in a mans world
> team-spec*Eiforia: i warned you...
> mr.boggieman: nice knowing u hamish
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: do it bro
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: use that power
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: Kick me
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: I haven't done anything against the rules
> Hush: yeah, we are all men here
> Påß: yep
> team-spec*Eiforia: sexism
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: Come at me bro.
> Påß: lal
> team-spec*Eiforia: "bro"
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: ok, come at me sis
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: dis lag
> Påß: im laggin hard +_*
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: all down to Elforia's horse porn
> Påß: lol
> CanisLupus: ok son
> CanisLupus: enjoy your vacation
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: lawl
> team-spec*Eiforia: bye bye Hamish
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: remember
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: FIGHT THE POWER
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish: FUCK THESE BULLSHIT ADMINS
> [SAS]Lt.Hamish left the game.

Violations of 3c, 3e and 4a. Since a staff tag (team-spec*) was in use and there is a clear period between the first annoyance and the second, there are no appeal grounds. You decided to say stupid shit to a staff member and they elected to ban for it. Some of us will tolerate it and some will not.

I'm sorry but that log has been modified. Elforia was not using "team-spec". I request to see a screenshot please.

I don't think someone from the admin team is actually buying that lie, Hamish.

I'm sad that you're implying that I'd falsify evidence for any reason whatsoever.

I know the odds are stacked against me, but I'm telling you, like I said in my OP, Elforia did not have team-spec next to his name that day.

The only way that could have been true is if an admin command to rename was executed on Eiforia, which would change the real name (the one which is logged) and not the displayed name, which is the UTComp name. The chances of this are approximately 0%.

SASHamish wrote:I know the odds are stacked against me, but I'm telling you, like I said in my OP, Elforia did not have team-spec next to his name that day.

Regardless of that, the point is, that from the log, you're clearly aware of her mod / admin status anyway.

Izumo_CZ wrote:

SASHamish wrote:I know the odds are stacked against me, but I'm telling you, like I said in my OP, Elforia did not have team-spec next to his name that day.

Regardless of that, the point is, that from the log, you're clearly aware of her mod / admin status anyway.

Ah, so she is a woman.

Explains everything.

Tally ho chaps, I'll take my ban, but on April 9th, prepare for some serious mayhem.

Oh and Aza, I didn't mean to offend you. I am not in any way implying that you are lying however, I do have a photographic memory and I can clearly remember that Elforia that day did not have team-spec next to her name. I don't know she could change/hax the logs, but in my opinion, that is what has happened.

SASHamish wrote: Oh and Aza, I didn't mean to offend you. I am not in any way implying that you are lying however, I do have a photographic memory and I can clearly remember that Elforia that day did not have team-spec next to her name. I don't know she could change/hax the logs, but in my opinion, that is what has happened.

So you blame a member of the ldg staff for faking evidence ? Would be worth a ban extension again...

I was there when you was banned and i can witness that Eiforia was carrying the team-spec tag