LDG-Gaming

Izumo_CZ wrote: 10/10 for me (though I think it was 100% obvious that it's coming after the last posts that were deleted )

Azarael wrote:Posts of lower than normal quality will be tolerated because of the low userbase. Le troll face and EMP spam will not.

Another 10/10. You're trolled, not a troll.

You're in a discussion about how this shit posting is getting out of hand and you make a reply with this shit in it? What exactly are you trying to prove?

Easy there, a few posts is hardly 'out of hand'.
Maybe it was intended as a joke.
Perhaps lets end this topic here.

It's funny how my on topic post deleted, but the post count/meme rants aren't. Anyone care to fill me in on how this forum works?

I deleted anything relevant to the EMP shitposting and anything which became out of context because of the loss of another post. That included my own posts.

CaptainXavious wrote:

Izumo_CZ wrote: 10/10 for me (though I think it was 100% obvious that it's coming after the last posts that were deleted )

Azarael wrote:Posts of lower than normal quality will be tolerated because of the low userbase. Le troll face and EMP spam will not.

Another 10/10. You're trolled, not a troll.

You're in a discussion about how this shit posting is getting out of hand and you make a reply with this shit in it? What exactly are you trying to prove?

I'm saying it's not out of hand and don't think it's going there - at least for now. What would happen here when Takeo or Aza never replied here when it comes to the shit posting about EMP? Nothing, hmm? Get the "you're trolled, not a troll" now?

What I get, Izumo, is that you'd rather make a joke than act responsibly as an admin when it matters.

That snitch thread is a monument to this. When someone suggested a change/addition to a rule to help keep that sort of behavior from the original poster in check, your reply was something along the lines of "OMG I AM A PRO RACER" without so much as acknowledging the request.

When someone was banned for propagating the whole "glitch snitch" crap, your first reply, in the public thread, was "What's fucking wrong with that?" undermining the authority of the other admin in full view of everything.

And then this, again, undermining the authority of two other admin at the same time.

Yeah, I get it. You're happy to ignore administrative duties for the sake of a joke.

To be fair in the name case, he apologised for that and it was based under a misunderstanding that the user in question wasn't a member of the reporter persecution brigade.

Consider it this way: we chose to make our opinion of the shitposting known and it didn't stop...

CaptainXavious wrote:What I get, Izumo, is that you'd rather make a joke than act responsibly as an admin when it matters.

I'm well aware where the border of trolling ends.

CaptainXavious wrote:That snitch thread is a monument to this. When someone suggested a change/addition to a rule to help keep that sort of behavior from the original poster in check, your reply was something along the lines of "OMG I AM A PRO RACER" without so much as acknowledging the request.

Quoted the part that had nothing to do rule change/addition as that was concluded already.

CaptainXavious wrote:When someone was banned for propagating the whole "glitch snitch" crap, your first reply, in the public thread, was "What's fucking wrong with that?" undermining the authority of the other admin in full view of everything.

Explained by Aza and yes it should have been at least private.

CaptainXavious wrote:And then this, again, undermining the authority of two other admin at the same time.

Yeah, I get it. You're happy to ignore administrative duties for the sake of a joke.

The whole point is that those two authorities proclaimed themselves here completely needlessly, so I would say. Again, what would happen if they didn't post here "party ends"? Absolutely nothing. Well, they posted that and got trolled.

Trolls shouldnt be 24 years old, Izumo.

I think iRobot is actually older than me