False comparisons ahoy, Jate.
We're not in a place devoted to satire and comedy. Allow offensive satire on the server and you can expect to hear it all the time, because then the admins have no teeth to moderate anyone.
I don't really understand the problem here. This is a game server, a place for playing a game. We who run it do not appreciate the trivialisation of important history in the form of satire. I'm sure some people do appreciate a mockery being made of every issue, no matter how personal, which exists in society at large - great. You're entitled to do whatever you want in public places and, indeed, permissive private places. Just not here.
While we're on the subject of implied politicial correctness, I must note that the only logical positions to hold in the debate are:
a) Full authoritarianism. Ban everything offensive.
b) Full libertarianism. Allow ALL speech. This will include allowing people to call each other racist nicknames. Would anyone like to suggest the difference between allowing mockery of the Holocaust and allowing mockery of race?
c) Reactive. Ban offensive speech as long as a member has actually found it offensive.
I feel it's time to sort this out once and for all and come up with a definite policy. So far, policy c) has been that of LDG, but it would appear that we have more than a few Stephen Fry devotees around.
Stephen Fry wrote:It's now very common to hear people say 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what?
Let's hear the positions you hold and the reasons for your holding them.