Page 4 of 5

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 2:07 pm
by ZioFede
he said his budget is 800 pounds, not 2000

>Not if you get a boner when your game is running smooth @ ultra @ UHD.

what kind of futurist gpu run games in 4k at ultra with 60 fps and more?

fullhd is where it's at with that money

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 2:17 pm
by ZioFede
and those cpus you are suggesting facepalm

a 7600k or ryzen r5 6 or 4 cores will be more than enough...

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 3:42 pm
by Calypto
Really you should be investing in a 1920x1080 monitor with >144hz refresh rate and <2ms response time instead of inane shit like Goytel vs. AMD vs. NVIDYA. The monitor is what you'll be looking at 99% of the time anyway. Get Windows 8.0 and you'll be set (8.1 and 10 have awful input lag).

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 3:54 pm
by Den
Ha, as Windows 8.0 has less lags

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 7:50 pm
by iRobot
Advising Windows 8 for a gaming machine is horrible advice. Windows 10 is the only one with DX12 support.

If future proofing the build is the goal, why would you go with an ancient OS?

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 10:35 pm
by ZioFede
because calypso

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Thu 09 Mar , 2017 11:05 pm
by Calypto
>playing modern games
good goyim, pay for reskins and lack of mod support for planned obsolescence for more shekels

>windows 10
>computer shuts off during game
>1 core is at 100% due to botnet
>input lag

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Fri 10 Mar , 2017 3:13 am
by Nardaq_NL
ZioFede wrote:he said his budget is 800 pounds, not 2000

>Not if you get a boner when your game is running smooth @ ultra @ UHD.

what kind of futurist gpu run games in 4k at ultra with 60 fps and more?

fullhd is where it's at with that money
Where you see my initial setup costing 2000? more like 1000 but okey. (ya, no need to point that out its over 800, i said already 2011-3 is not the cheapest socket) O=
The idea is to upgrade it and buy a secondhand faster CPU in the future for about $250 lasting another 4 years (not forgetting the GPU)
ZioFede wrote:and those cpus you are suggesting facepalm

a 7600k or ryzen r5 6 or 4 cores will be more than enough...
So is a 400 pound setup. I'm pointing out for a long term setup, which wont need a replacement after 4 years.


My experience/opintion is to stay away from "OC" GPU's and ATI. Nothing but trouble. (artifacts and shitty drivers) Nvidia all the way. joinha

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Fri 10 Mar , 2017 9:10 am
by ZioFede
you don't need a beast cpu for a "longterm setup", lotsa people still play with the 2500k... you're just wasting your money because games prefer an high ipc cpu than
"moar corez!!!"

the nvidia/amd shit is pretty subjective, nvidia releases tons of shitty drivers too

Re: Building a PC

Posted: Fri 10 Mar , 2017 10:15 am
by iRobot
Image