UnWheel
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: UnWheel
Then you can consider it as the KS system; the kind of player who will collect many points doesn't need the effect.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: UnWheel
Yeah but many times you don't actually get the benefit from the jump if you could take it.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: UnWheel
Can't disagree on that.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: UnWheel
For amusement, there is support for manual transmission (Fire - Gear Up, AltFire - Gear Down). You have to type "uwdebug" to console to see RPM / Gear, since there is no support for this in UI atm.
Damage effect to acceleration is halved. You will very likely have better acceleration if you transmit manually when damaged (damage affects automatic transmission).
Oh and the reason for mismatches perhaps is the .int file on clients, loading the cars
There is a second car in there:
Just was playing to get a more like sports car handling. It's not available to selection on the server.
Damage effect to acceleration is halved. You will very likely have better acceleration if you transmit manually when damaged (damage affects automatic transmission).
Oh and the reason for mismatches perhaps is the .int file on clients, loading the cars

There is a second car in there:
Code: Select all
Vehicle=(ClassName=UnWheelSCars.UWSCarFlairFOne,FriendlyName=UnWheelSCars.UWSCarFlairFOne.VehicleNameString,FallbackName="Flair F1",FallbackDesc="Flair F1")
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: UnWheel
I'm quite for having manual transmission as a constant gameplay element. It's quite hard to play with. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to offer that much benefit.
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: UnWheel
Depends how realistic you would want to make it.. like driving in a high gear with low speed on low traction surfaces to reduce wheelspin etc!
Or the obvious opposite where you redline each gear to improve acceleration. I don't think many people would enjoy doing that.
Or the obvious opposite where you redline each gear to improve acceleration. I don't think many people would enjoy doing that.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: UnWheel
At least one person complained that UnWheel was "boring" and we already have a lot of simplification when it comes to steering. Adding more elements is OK with me.
Redlining the Flair doesn't offer any improved performance, I've found. On the contrary, my laptimes are slower when shifting manually.
Redlining the Flair doesn't offer any improved performance, I've found. On the contrary, my laptimes are slower when shifting manually.
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: UnWheel
Who complained it was boring? If they were winning every race with ease then perhaps.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: UnWheel
SirSmokeALot, probably because "muh guns."
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: UnWheel
Well point still stands. If they aren't winning all the time with ease then increasing the difficulty will probably not appease that 'boredom'.
The gametype will undoubtedly have some people who dislike it. I fucking hate duel.
Tracked stats and laptimes will make the gametype have more depth, though you already know that.
The gametype will undoubtedly have some people who dislike it. I fucking hate duel.
Tracked stats and laptimes will make the gametype have more depth, though you already know that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests