Abusive Ban !

[LaPutaLoca]

I just saw i was banned...

What was the reason ?

Teams were not fair.
So i asked someone to switch, one time, 2 times, 3 times ! Look at the logs !!!
Noone switched
So i became a spectator

What is the problem ?

If u look at the logs, i re-joined when the game became fair, and in the same team I was before.

What is the problem ?

If u ban regular people for trying to make the game fair, servers will be empty 24/24... time with enough people is so rare !

I really don't understand your action...

[Earl_Vencar.:LLS:.]

Read the rules. You abused the team balancer and the person who got switched complained.

[LaPutaLoca]

he should have switched to make the game fair...

Look at his words before i became a spectator : " Tarie$: this is rape"
He was happy to ruin the game !

no comment !

[iRobot]

Forcing someone to swap team will also ruin their experience. Not every game is going to be perfectly balanced. Just look forward to the next.

[iZumo]

You can't use the balancer to forcibly switch someone, despite it makes the teams more balanced. It's however only a single day ban.

[LaPutaLoca]

in this game, the experience was already ruined...

I waited and joined when each team got the same number of players (including me)

How can I be more fair ?

After that, the game was far better for all players (except Taries)

Just look at the context before banning people !

[LaPutaLoca]

i didn't do that to make someone switch
was just bored by the ruined game....
i could have quit the game, the result would have be the same...

one minute ban would be too much

we are loosing people each month... why are you doing that ?

[LaPutaLoca]

look at the logs, i asked at least 3-4 times someone to swap before leaving, they could not have missed it !

[Den]

If you leave game or become a spectator and after this action a player was automatically switched to enemy team then you are not able to join untill current map will be finished. It's a rule. And no matter why did you do it.

[LaPutaLoca]

Sorry, I thought admins were considering all the context...
and were intelligent enough to interpret the rule and not ban in a unfair way...