Fags

Discuss matters related to LDG or UT2004 which aren't specific to any server.
Michie
Banned
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun 07 Oct , 2012 2:30 am

Fags

Post by Michie » Sun 10 Feb , 2013 12:50 am

So we get banned for calling each other Fags ? Just got banned for saying Fag.Cant have it both ways folks .Its one way or another.Get it right Guys and Ladies.Michie

SASHamish
Banned
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon 10 Dec , 2012 3:58 pm

Re: Fags

Post by SASHamish » Sun 10 Feb , 2013 11:40 pm

Michie wrote:So we get banned for calling each other Fags ? Just got banned for saying Fag.Cant have it both ways folks .Its one way or another.Get it right Guys and Ladies.Michie
I agree, this server is going tits up.
Awards and Accolades Won

Most Banned player on LDG
Best joint Soprano Singer (Tied with Azarael)
2nd Player ever to return from Permanent Ban (YEAH I KNOW!?)

...More to come soon!

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: Fags

Post by Azarael » Sun 10 Feb , 2013 11:59 pm

Wrong forum. Moved.

Fag and its variants are banned because they're homophobic insults. If you honestly cannot talk to people without saying that word then you need to reevaluate your own vocabulary. You were banned for a single game and the banning staff member was Calypto, whose duty it is to expand upon what exactly happened.

There is a divide in the rules between the BW servers (which are more strictly moderated) and the AS/Race server. AS/Race these days isn't my business, do as you like on there, but on the BW servers that rule stands. For me as well.

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Fags

Post by iZumo » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 9:49 am

Hmm? I don't recall that "fag" would ever be a bannable offence. It's even a trigger for sentitel. I must say I'm with Michie on this, this is becoming ridiculous (when it is not spammed).

Secondly, I'm further going to question this ban - why under such terms "with fag / gay being bannable" Calypso's frequently spammed word "goy" = non-Jew would not be?

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Fags

Post by iRobot » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 12:39 pm

Yeah I'm with Izumo on this.

You can't have things acceptable on one LDG server, and prohibited on another LDG server.

That's all there really is to say on the matter.

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: Fags

Post by Azarael » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 3:39 pm

OK, let's expand on this.

BW and AS/Race have been differently moderated for months now, and I'm surprised that you're all not aware of this. There are bans in the log for "insulting", which nobody has ever been banned for on AS/Race barring severe harassment, for obvious reasons. giZmo has himself declared that if the rules on BW have to match the rules on #1 (and not vice versa), he would no longer be interested in administrating.

Much license is given on AS/Race because of the historical friction between the two gametype communities which inhabit it, the nature of the playerbase and, lately, the reduction of available administrators for AS/Race.

Specifically on the word "fag" and its variants: http://www.ldg-gaming.eu/viewtopic.php? ... 6&start=10 was where the topic was first mentioned. I have also had a player of that orientation who plays on the server tell me that he finds it extremely offensive. I take the view that if anything both a) peripheral and b) unnecessary to the game is causing offense, it can and should be moderated.

On "goy": See above. For me, it's a completely inoffensive word with no power or history behind it. Even if you know the actual meaning of it ("non-Jew"), what's there to be offended about?

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Fags

Post by iRobot » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 3:46 pm

It's borderline retarded to have rules differing between servers when LDG is supposed to be a community and encourages playing on all servers. Hell, they're even advertised in game.

Why even mention gizmo? If he wants to make a threat like that, then it's kinda not the place to mention it here.

You're basically saying "OK, you're allowed to be insulting and offensive on assault, but in ballistic weapons we all play super seriously and brofist at the end of the game."

Nonsense.

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: Fags

Post by Azarael » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 3:51 pm

Enforcement between administrators has always differed. Look how attitudes to glitching have changed on AS/Race for example. It's still an offense but it depends on the admin who is present whether you get banned for it.

In actual fact, there IS an anti-insulting rule.

3e) Do not insult other players. One might rage every now and then but direct insults - even 'idiot' - is not welcome. If you feel insulted, contact an admin instead of fighting back.

So this has actually now become a case of differing enforcement of rules by different admins. BW admins follow the rules to the letter. AS/Race is less strictly moderated. Do any of you really think that should change?

I mention giZmo because whether anyone likes it or not, politics is an issue for LDG and I have no intention of seeing giZmo leave the staff. I'd rather declare things openly rather than hold a secret bias.

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Fags

Post by iZumo » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 6:08 pm

I don't really see a problem in a tolerance on different servers. Different communities, different moderators. While it would be ideal to see it same on all servers, it's pretty much impractical. giZmo is the admin moderating the BW server and I don't see a problem with him setting the level of tolerance on BW, as long as it's not exaggerated of course.

As for "goy" I can easily imagine it being using in conjuction with Nazism because of it's meaning (not saying Calypso is using it that way!) and I myself would consider that bannable (also giZmo questioned that if I remember).

Back to fag, there is a topic about exaggeration in the admin forum. You can't just ban for a word based on opinion of one person. Then another person would find word y offensive and another person would find word z offensive etc. and it would end up with maddness. Given what you had said about "goy" I would consider my opinion about it a bit exaggerated - so don't see an issue there then. I don't see an issue with fag, cunt etc. either and if someone gets banned for that (in a manner he would get banned for n-word, just with different ban length) then I do find that exaggerated. I myself would actually consider "fag", "cunt", "goy" etc. on a similar sort of "level". And there are also more phrases commonly used around and seen fine commonly, such as "grammar nazi".

Of course another story is when it's spammed.

User avatar
Deathblade
System Administrator
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue 09 Feb , 2010 7:21 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Fags

Post by Deathblade » Mon 11 Feb , 2013 6:14 pm

As I understood, two guys has called each other "Fag"?

Is anyone feel insulted about this ? And what this has to do with Nazism ?
The LDG admin !

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest