Reverse Friendly Fire
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Reverse Friendly Fire
We have all witnessed how rFF does nothing to help ease the spam, it has only increased the frustration of people walking in your face and YOU being punished for it.
Therefore, I motion for regular friendly fire to be enabled, to encourage more sensible play by everyone. You wouldn't jump in the crossfire with FF enabled, so lets build that mindset up.
I don't see a risk of abuse, as the BW server pretty much permanently has a moderator or admin on it at the busier times.
I honestly think this is worth a trial. You could make it like 50% or 25% though, 100% would just be a massacre.
Opinions?
Therefore, I motion for regular friendly fire to be enabled, to encourage more sensible play by everyone. You wouldn't jump in the crossfire with FF enabled, so lets build that mindset up.
I don't see a risk of abuse, as the BW server pretty much permanently has a moderator or admin on it at the busier times.
I honestly think this is worth a trial. You could make it like 50% or 25% though, 100% would just be a massacre.
Opinions?
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
It did reduce the spam, until it was reduced to 25% ._.
But yes, ppl walking to your line of fire sucks with rFF.
With normal FF, melee is not possible, coz the spammers on your team will pwn you. And many ppl will just shoot you for
But yes, ppl walking to your line of fire sucks with rFF.
With normal FF, melee is not possible, coz the spammers on your team will pwn you. And many ppl will just shoot you for

- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
Yeah, reduced, and rightly so - because as I said in the first sentence of my last post. Someone walks in your face while you're shooting, and you get punished for it.
It should be the other way round. Hence the motioning for regular FF.
It should be the other way round. Hence the motioning for regular FF.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
RFF could be disabled for non-rapid fire weapons?
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
I don't see the point in band-aid fixing stupidity.
If someone goes charging into the crossfire, they should suffer consequences.
If someone goes charging into the crossfire, they should suffer consequences.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
I'm 100% sure that there will be rages about normal FF when a noob teammate kills you. Just as noob can walk into your fire, another noob will start firing when he's behind you. Then another HAMR noob behind you will spam the area. Then some melee noob will cut you down because he's spamming LMB / RMB and you're around him. Both rFF & FF are imperfect, but certainly rFF is better than FF, because the occurence of "bad rFF" is lower than the occurence of "bad FF" and we don't have a proper way how to isolate the bad cases now.
- giZmo
- Hogwarts Professor
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Sat 17 Sep , 2011 12:12 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
Sure enable 100% normal FF to the game and you are toasted if two of your mates spam into aiRobot wrote:It should be the other way round. Hence the motioning for regular FF.
group of enemies you are fighting with. All what they will say after is "Oops" and we/you can do
nothing to punish them for that cause you can´t prove it was on purpose.
"We never truly know how to appreciate something until we have lost it forever."
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
Compromise then. Is it possible to tweak FF so both the shooter, and the reciever, take 25% of the damage?
No way to abuse unless you want to die too, and people can learn to be more careful.
No way to abuse unless you want to die too, and people can learn to be more careful.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
Hmm.
This is now a problem. With RFF on, you get punished for the bad play of others when they cut across you. With FF on, you get punished if noobs start spamming into close combat and melee.
This is now a problem. With RFF on, you get punished for the bad play of others when they cut across you. With FF on, you get punished if noobs start spamming into close combat and melee.
- CaptainXavious
- V.I.P. Member
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Tue 07 Jun , 2011 2:49 am
- Contact:
Re: BallisticPro changelogs, discussion and trolling
Could you add a buffer of sorts that ignores the first X damage before rFF kicks in? That should provide lenience for a few stray bullets and still punish people who sustain fire on team mates.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests