Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
That's why the other weapon would be in KS1, so it would not be just "another assault rifle". Don't see a problem why there should be differences in the two wep slot. If people choose stupidly, let them, their problem. Just need to set a good pair for default ones. Say, you'd have M763 & X83 on Goatswood / Highlander. Deermaster would fill in the gap here pretty well.
And yeah, imagine Highlander with one wep.
And yeah, imagine Highlander with one wep.
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
God forbid you actually have to plan your gameplay based on your loadout. I thought that was the original intention of the system. Highlander is a good example actually. If you choose a shotgun and a sniper on that map, you need nothing else.
It stagnates the gameplay. 3 slots would just neuter it.
It stagnates the gameplay. 3 slots would just neuter it.
- Takeo
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar , 2010 7:31 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
That's actually not a bad idea there.Izumo_CZ wrote:And yeah, imagine Highlander with one wep.
What do you think of the idea to enable the secondary weapon after your third kill? If you think that it imbalances the gameplay, one could disable the secondary weapon for the first three rounds. And yet another idea is to disable the secondary weapon for the team leading with more than two points (e.g. 5:3).
"Let the discussion begin."

- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
This Takeo.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
Takeo wrote:That's actually not a bad idea there.Izumo_CZ wrote:And yeah, imagine Highlander with one wep.
What do you think of the idea to enable the secondary weapon after your third kill? If you think that it imbalances the gameplay, one could disable the secondary weapon for the first three rounds. And yet another idea is to disable the secondary weapon for the team leading with more than two points (e.g. 5:3).
"Let the discussion begin."

- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
- giZmo
- Hogwarts Professor
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Sat 17 Sep , 2011 12:12 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
-5/10
"We never truly know how to appreciate something until we have lost it forever."
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
Seems well received. Locked secondary until round 4 it is!
- Calypto
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Tue 27 Dec , 2011 6:24 am
- Location: New York State
- Contact:
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
You can still see the LS14 muzzle flare through walls, same with the E-23.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Ballistic Bro Changelogs Discussion
It's not the muzzle flare, it's the impact effect. Fixing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest